The hidden risk in Agentic AI
Introduction
Today’s push to deploy autonomous, agentic AI systems may be repeating a well-known mistake from the early days of microservices. What was once heralded as a path to agility and scalability ended up producing brittle, interdependent systems — “distributed monoliths” — that proved fragile and hard to maintain.
Unless architects learn from that history, agentic AI risks falling into the same trap. The approach has to be different, instead of linking agents with synchronous, point-to-point calls, build them on an event-driven, loosely coupled architecture, enabling resilience, scalability, observability and long-term growth.
The microservices déjà vu
When microservices first became popular, the idea was to break big monolithic applications into smaller, more modular services. Each service could evolve and scale independently. In theory this promised flexibility, faster deployment cycles, and easier maintainability. But in practice many teams implemented microservices with synchronous API calls — service A calling service B, which…





Yes! Google’s new TPUs/CPUs feel like a real move to make big AI workloads cheaper, not just faster. Nvidia still dominates the flexible GPU space, but it’s cool to see big players starting to look around, even Meta seems to be eyeing a big TPU investment. Interesting shift in the AI chip world! https://www.reuters.com/business/meta-talks-spend-billions-googles-chips-information-reports-2025-11-25/?utm_source=chatgpt.com